The
Trial of Brother Gore: How to fail a revolution
BY: Lomuche Nyaloro,
JUBA
MAY 25/2010, SSN;
Quote: “…the most difficult, most important fight that
anyone with power faces is the fight against himself, the struggle for
self-control…against corruption and even against the abuse of one’s
prerogatives. One has to have a very well-trained, strong conscience, a
great deal of awareness…because the use of power the wrong way is
something you have to be on constant watch for.” (Castro, F (2007)
My Life, Penguin Books, London).
Defective birth:
The SPLM/A had a congenital defect right from birth. This defect was
a consequence of the manner of its birth. To date, many Southerners
still question the motivation of the SPLM/A’s birth. Some people say it
is a genuine revolutionary baby, while others ascribe its formation to
pique of and angry anti-Kokora forces from the other regions.
In the beginning,
those who doubted the liberation credential of the movement were mainly
found in Equatoria region. The ministers and governors in that region at
the time of formation rejected the SPLM/A outright. Ministers and other
officials had poured scorns on the objectives and pronouncements of the
movement. With time, it looked as though the movement might remain a
parochial, anti-Equatorians, outfit.
Dealing with
critics: In the 1980’s, the government formed following Kokora in
Equatoria was becoming guilty of the same discrimination of which the
regional government of Abel Alier was accused. The Central Equatorians
were now in ascendancy. The people of Eastern Equatoria, notably the
Acholi, the Lotuko and other ethnic groups voted with their feet and
joined the movement in droves. Still, the people of central Equatoria
remained opposed to the SPLM/A until the 1990’s. As the movement was
getting international recognition, its desire and craving to be accepted
by all the Southerners intensified.
Despite the near
fatal split 1991, which brought to the fore the dictatorial tendencies
of the SPLM/A leadership, some notable Equatorians, (names withheld),
who were previously opposed to the SPLM/A, decided to join the rank of
the movement at that moment.
The “capture” of
these notables by the SPLM was greatly prized. Without any military
training, and after confessing their sins, the late-coming Equatorians
became the blue-eyed “commanders” of Dr Garang, the leader of the
movement. The capture of the late-comers also revealed something about
the thinking of the SPLM/A leadership: that if you confess with your own
mouth and accept the greatness and messianic characteristics of the SPLM/A
leadership, all your past sins against the movement are forgiven (Note
the present unrestrained use of Biblical personalities in describing the
SPLM/A leadership; Moses and Joshua).
Those who, even
after fighting in the SPLA, but fail to profess their belief in the
leadership will not be forgiven. Those who fall in this latter category
are represented by Alfred Lado Gore.
The trial of Lado
Gore: Alfred Lado Gore was one of the early recruits to SPLA from
Central Equatoria. It is even claimed that he designed the present SPLM/A
flag (During the Elections, the SPLM confirmed that the flag was not a
Southern one and as such the independent candidates were forbidden from
using it).
Alfred had a quarrel
with Dr Garang and soon after this, took refuge in Uganda. There he
allegedly struck friendship with the Ugandan strong man, Yoweri Museveni,
to the chagrin of Dr Garang. Later, Alfred and other Central Equatorians
(mostly academics from the University of Nairobi) formed a guerilla
outfit, called Patriotic Resistance Movement (PRM). The PRM never took
off, and the rest of the members, apart from Alfred, were persuaded by
Wani Iga, the present Speaker of the Southern Sudan Legislative
Assembly, to join the SPLM/A.
In Nairobi, these
academics were inducted in the movement in front of Dr Garang. The
induction ritual consisted of shouting “SPLA oyee” three times and
“Garang Oyee”, also three times. The new recruits were then ordered to
politically destroy Alfred Lado Gore to show their loyalty to the
movement. This is the source of trouble for Alfred in the later years.
Fast-forward to
2010. When recently Alfred tried to contest for governorship of Central
Equatoria, he was blocked by the now infamous Electoral College in that
State. It is instructive to reiterate the philosophy of acceptance of
the SPLA/M leadership outlined above.
The former academics
colleagues of Alfred, who do not even know which end of the gun the
bullets exit from, are now being favored over Alfred who had risked his
life as a soldier in the SPLA. The professors have long since
acknowledged the messianic nature of the SPLM/A leadership.
Even after Alfred
had won the votes in the elections, he was denied his victory, on the
behest of the Garang’s widow. It is pertinent to ask the question: Will
the right of the people of Central Equatoria to elect their own leaders
from now onwards be under the control of Mrs. Garang? God forbids! One
cannot fail to notice the vindictiveness of the SPLM/A leadership here.
More significantly,
the SPLM/A chose Clement Wani Konga, an avowed enemy of the SPLA who was
wounded by the SPLA gun, over Alfred. Clearly, Clement must have
accepted the supremacy and divine nature of the SPLM/A leadership.
There is another
angle to this sad story. Clement has a cohesive militia. It is clear
that the Konga’s militia can cause problem for the ruling SPLM
leadership if Konga is not brought into the fold. Ominously, this goes
to confirm that owning a credible militia and, thus violence, pays in
the Southern politics!
There are other
former members of the SPLA who are not forgiven for their
steadfastness in resisting the blasphemous genuflection to the phony
messianic rubbish. They too suffered the same fate as Alfred’s during
the elections as independent candidates.
In their zeal to
intimidate the independent candidates in the last elections, the
care-take governors in Equatoria revealed to the population that they
had received the following instruction from the President of GOSS: to go
and smash the heads of all critics of the SPLM (present and past) who
were also the independent candidates (vide Governor (defeated) Nunu of
Western Equatoria as quoted in the press). Some of these patriots were
harassed and humiliated by the Kiir’s election Gestapo in the most
unforgettable manner.
Failing three
tests: True revolutionaries, such as Fidel Castro and Che Guevara
know precisely the motivation and the ethics that underlie a successful
liberation. Che believed that the only motivation for one to take up
arms against a repressive regime is the “love for people”, the down
trodden. Does SPLM/A love the people? Fidel Castro’s view on a
successful liberator has already been given above.
The three tests on
which the SPLM/A can now be examined for being true to its aims and
objectives are: what was its motivation for fighting the war; its
attitude to the use of power; and its alleged pursuit of reconciliation.
1)
The SPLM/A leadership claimed that
they were fighting for the rights of marginalized people of Sudan. These
rights are assumed to be economic, democratic, political and other
rights. The truthfulness of this claim could only be audited once the
SPLM/A was in power. It is now five years since the SPLM/A ascended to
power in the South. And the results are there for everyone to see:
rampant nepotism, tribalism, theft of public funds, marginalization of
certain groups, brutality, deceitfulness and the list goes on. Yet, the
GOSS President keeps talking about being zero tolerant to these vices.
Telling lies for public consumption has now become the staple of the
administration. Would Fidel Castro recognize the movement, which he
helped to nurture, if he were to come to the South? Can it be said that
the SPLM/A leadership have judiciously used the power to serve the
people of the South? The answers to these questions must be an emphatic
NO.
2)
During the last elections, the
SPLM/A terrorized the people of the South into voting for its candidates
to the exclusion of others. What happened to the claim of fighting for
the rights of the marginalized people? Where is the democratic right of
the Southerners? The hypocrisy of the SPLM/A officials in chiding the
National Congress Party (NCP) for infringing the rights of Sudanese
people is nauseating. The SPLM/A is now at par with NCP; it is an
oppressive and dictatorial regime which is totally foreign to the
aspirations of the Southerners. Would one say that the original
motivation for going to bush was the “love for the people”? The answers
must an emphatic NO.
3)
After the fraudulent elections,
Salva Kiir now talks of reconciliation among the Southerners. How can
one reconcile amidst constant provocations? Why persecute Paulino Matip,
by killing his troops in Unity State? How can you reconcile when you
steal the votes of other Southerners such Angelina Teny and Alfred Gore?
Can reconciliation thrive in the atmosphere of corruption,
discrimination, marginalization, ethnic chauvinism, exclusion and
theft? The answer to these questions is an
emphatic NO.
Conclusion:
As shown above, the SPLM/A has failed the tests of a true liberator. The
movement was conceived and born out of ethnic hatred, like all
illegitimate babies. Its objective is to establish an ethnic-based
dictatorship in the South. Only those who kneel down to accept the
supremacy of a central and anointed ethnic are invited to the
high table to eat. But, they will not be equal to the select few.
The Gores, Mulas,
Oduhos, Gwakis, Ohisas, Okuks, Ayoks, Angelinas, Kisangas, Kamuyanges,
Liyongs, Lomuches, Mois, etc, who believe in real freedom of our people,
are not invited.
The onus is now on
the Southerners to decide whether the ravenous, illegitimate, thieving
and parasitic clique that is now masquerading as liberators and rulers
in the South can continue to lord it over us ad infinitum. God
bless Southern Sudan.
Lomuche Nyaloro
is a Southern Sudanese residing in Juba and can be reached at
lonyaloro@yahoo.com
COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE
Disclaimer:
Disclaimer: The views expressed
above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the
website.