All eyes are
now on the Sudan as it counts its most controversial polls. However the
very observers that were brought to give witness have all said that the
elections were far from meeting the international standards.
President Omar
al-Bashir’s ruling party has already rejected US accusations that last
week’s landmark polls in Sudan were not free and fair, but welcomed an
overture for co-operation with Washington.
“One of the
most important criteria to meet the international standards is ‘free and
fair,’ and we have met this criteria,” Ibrahim Ghandoor, a senior
official of the National Congress Party (NCP), said, without saying how.
However, those
who listened to the BBC Hardtalk interview with SPLM chairman Salva Kiir
Mayardit can still recall that, this former warlord was in no any way to
condone the out-come of an elections that he insisted was pre-rigged. I
hope Zeinab Badawi of the BCC can come to my rescue in case someone
accuses me of making up stories.
What cannot be
denied is that in spite of SPLM‘s continues attempts at projecting a
picture of being the best of the two evils (SPLM & NCP), but because it
also has to struggle hard to maintain its grip in the south, the self
proclaimed liberators of south Sudan are already on record for
harassments, intimidations, and threats of physical harm during the
elections. And I quote:
"Political
rights and freedoms were circumscribed throughout the electoral process,
there were reports of intimidation and threats of violence in South
Sudan, ongoing conflict in Darfur did not permit an environment
conducive to acceptable elections, and inadequacies in technical
preparations for the vote resulted in serious irregularities," the White
House said in a statement. (The Washington Post, Wednesday 21st
2010).
While SPLM
struggles to make sense of its position as, both a peace partner to the
NCP and at the same time a leading member in the northern opposition
alliance, it too has much to sort out at home.
Currently the
three southern states of Central Equatoria, Western Equatoria and the
Oil producing Unity State are experiencing circumstances that will no
doubt be of great impact to the entire SPLM establishment.
There have
already been reports in the media that the SPLM is trying all that it
can in order to rig the results of the gubernatorial elections not only
in the aforementioned states which it has obviously lost to the
independent candidates, but it seems also to be struggling in Northern
Bahr and Jonglei States.
It is no
surprise that the SPLM finds itself struggling even within its own
backyards as it had relegated itself to a party that only caters for the
egoist interest of a few in its Political Bureau. And more awkwardly it
is now fighting against the popular choices of the grassroots. If at all
it has the guts to harass and intimidate at this time, what on earth
does it‘s leadership intend to do when they finally become the sole
rulers, come 2011?
The events
unfolding in the Unity State of south Sudan are enough to give even the
most naïve outsider that south Sudan under the SPLM remains to be
governed by the jungle law. How on earth can the care-taker governor
Brigadier Taban Deng Gai order his security guards to over-run the
National Elections Commission head office in Bentiu, simply because he
is not making it at the polls?
Now that the
south cannot contain its differences to the extent that elections
results are likely to spark a wave of violence despite the general call
for sobriety, this by itself brings to question the basic ability of the
South to be a law abiding part of the human civilization.
It is indeed
embarrassing to hear that a team called ‘neutral NEC officials’ are on
their way from Khartoum to settle the disagreements in Bentiu. Is it not
a shame that southerners still have to resort to the north in order to
settle south- south misunderstandings?
Throughout
these elections, people have witnessed the overuse if not a frank abuse
of the security forces all over south Sudan. Now there is no way that
the SPLM party can pretend to be not behind all the humiliations and
intimidations that took place. To the least, all the official organs in
south Sudan remain loyal to SPLM. Who says otherwise?
SPLM must come
to accept that it has already been exposed and it is in no any way
better than its partner the NCP, as far as dictatorial attitudes are
concerned. It remains a crude party, without the least understanding of
its people’s rights. And none of its warlords can ever liberate south
Sudan, as liberation entails more than just fighting military battles.
You can never have a healthy thinking nation if you continuously harass,
bully and intimidate your citizens.
For south
Sudan to proceed forwards without being pulled into an unnecessary local
confrontations amongst its own people, the ruling SPLM needs to cope up
with all issues that have come about with elections and their results.
You cannot cheat the people’s votes in order to impose yourselves as
rulers. And should it all go wrong, the international community has the
right to hold you responsible.
When people
refused to vote for SPLM’s gubernatorial candidates in four or five
southern states, they mean it. It is a message that must be respected
for the sake of a new dawn, civility and democracy. And the more you
intimidate the people, the more you prove to them that your leadership
definitely is not the right one.
The change
that has started from Yambio, to Juba, to Bentiu can never be stopped.
Either SPLM becomes sensible and listens to the people or it risks
loosing it all.
Hopefully the
international community remains alert and watchful and should do the
right thing before things get out of control. However though I advocate
the right of our people to defend their achievements, I strongly
denounce any resort to violence. We are too poor to break any public
facility. Pacifism and vigilance should be our main stay.
“The freedom to express varying and often opposing ideas is essential to
a variety of conceptions of democracy. If democracy is viewed as
essentially a process – a way in which collective decisions for a
society are made – free expression is crucial to the openness of the
process and to such characteristics as elections, representation of
interests, and the like.” Jonathan D. Casper.