SouthSudanNation.com   DAWLA JUNUB EL SUDAN  
 

The Independent site for South Sudan Independence 

 

Archive

Editorial

Chronology          

Quotations Ed. cartoon Letters Feedback
 

Machakos Protocol

 

Wealth sharing Agreement

 

Power sharing Protocol

 

Interim Security  Agreement

 

Cartoons

 

 

 

 

 
Is Somebody Slowly and Surely Killing the SPLM/GOSS?

By Dominic Woja Maku

 
April 17,2008
 
Immediately following the GoSS announcement that it will not participate in the national census that flopped, many reactions came from numerous sources, some condemning the decision, but others applauded it. Despite the prior prescribed reasons many have rushed to blame the GoSS and the SPLM party for their drastic last minute decision not to carry out the census exercise.

However, given the crystal clear reasons the GoSS had provided (the IPDs who are stuck in the north and elsewhere, and other compelling reasons), a prominent Sudanese Minister arguably lambasted the SPLM for not seeing the consequences that might arise from the decision taken by the GoSS. I quote from the SouthSudanNet as reported by the Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) on April 17, 2008.

 
"The census was approved by the Sudanese presidential council in line with the accord signed by the government of Sudan and the SPLM in 2005," Sudan News Agency (SUNA) quoted Minister of State at the Ministry of Information and Communication Kamal Ebeid as saying.
"The movement will be fully responsible for possible failure of the accord, " he warned.
"History will never forgive the movement for committing such a mistake against the people of Sudan.
"The day will come when the people hold the SPLM accountable for all of its mistakes," the minister asserted.
"The position of the movement against the census was no surprise given its former numerous grave mistakes," he pointed out.
"The position reflects an internal struggle within the movement which lacks institutionalism and does not respect its leaders," Ebeid underscored.
 
Yes, the above lengthy quote came from the mouth of a prominent Sudanese Minister as reported by the Kuwait News Agency (KUNA). Now what exactly did the minister mean in his statements above?

Well, as the days roll by many politicians (inside and outside of the SPLM/GoSS) are grappling with what is going on and who is doing what, why, how, and when?

Many scholars and academics (indicts and edicts) would argue that what the NCP and its politicians are doing right now is playing macro politics in order to push the SPLM to internalize the political landscape in the Sudan to the detriment of the SPLM's micro political structures.

In other words, the NCP and it political ideologues are trying to create a political underdog in the SPLM so that they can justify how they can suffocate the guinea-pig up right in front of the SPLM officials, and the whole world can do nothing but just observe.

 
Now let's focus on the minister's last sentence from the quote: "The position reflects an internal struggle within the movement which lacks institutionalism and does not respect its leaders," Ebeid said.

Alright, is it true that the SPLM as a political party lacks institutionalism? Experts on political institutionalism would say no, the SPLM actually has institutions fit enough to operate as any other political party would in the world, be it in Northern Sudan or elsewhere in Africa. It sounds good, but many political analysts would scrutinize the SPLM internal structures and suggest that perhaps the good officers in the party take a second look and re-examine whether the political structures of the SPLM are actually functioning.

The minister might be pointing his finger at something he has seen that the SPLM officials did not, or can not see. Are there individuals who are slowly and surely killing the SPLM party from within?

 
It would be a naive thing to do if some elements within the SPLM and the GoSS take the minister's accusations "blames" as he has suggested lightly. What is very important at the moment is for the GoSS and the SPLM to strengthen the the institutional structures by staffing the political bureau with the best brains (well informed and can not easily be toasted around like eggs for breakfast).

As you all know in politics, a rat cannot wrestle with an elephant.