|
Enough of Contradictory Positions on South Sudan
independence
“Enough for Partisanship! Let Us Take Our Independence Seriously and
NOW before TOMORROW.”
By: Dr. Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
DEC 9/2009, SSN; Though we are not yet clearly out
of the woods, but the south Sudanese’s call
for an independent state has
gained a huge momentum
lately, thanks to the stubbornness of
the ruling Islamic National Congress Party (NCP) of President Omer al
Bashir. Whatever obstacles
put in order to impede the smooth and timely implementation of the CPA
by the greedy Islamists,
thanks to God that all have
turned out to be blessings in disguise.
The opinion polls so far registered says that both the local and the
international communities are beginning to adjust to the fact that, the
long held illusion of maintaining a united Sudan has at last given way
to the true realities of the Sudanese politics and the sentiments of two
Sudanese states are being shared by both southerners as well as
northerners. Whereas the southern majority is open to voice this
clearly, the majority of the northerners are still held in their deeply
rooted hypocrisy where their true views are only said behind closed
door. If
you have lived in northern Sudan, then you are likely to have come
across situations where the public statements are actually the clear
opposite to what is held at heart.
The situation with majority of the northern Sudanese political parties
is that, they are finding it difficult to come to terms with the
unstoppable wave of Independence that is sweeping throughout southern
Sudan. They would like to believe the contrary, and wish that south
Sudanese’s call for independence is only a call for help that can be watered
down as usual
with false promises of development and more wealth sharing delusions (where
the wealth being
shared, ironically all
come from the South).
The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that resulted in the wrongly
named government of National Unity (GoNU) is in fact, nothing more that
a cease fire between the warring factions with the word unity being just
loosely attached to it. In this agreement like many other documents the
real intentions of
those who signed it only starts to show at the moment of implementation,
hence the commonly used expression that the devil lies in the details.
The NIF/NCP wants to remain in power both in the North and the South. It
signed the CPA with the calculated plan to bring in the SPLM and, of
course, the other opposition groups, so that they become easy preys to
destroy. On the other hand, we cannot also naively assume that the
opposition groups who came in did so without having to rehearsal
survival drills.
This far each and every political group is left to readjust according to
the realities on the ground. The NCP has definitely not succeeded in
incorporating the SPLM into its ranks as initially wished, nor has it
totally dealt away with the northern opposition forces. It is also true
that the SPLM has not been able to bring about its founder’s dream of
the secular United New Sudan either alone or in collaboration with
its former alliance of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), nor has
the northern Sudanese opposition at large did any thing much in a way of
bringing the NIF/NCP down through the much talked about popular uprising”
Intifada”.
As
for the SPLM, the realities on the ground has cost its ill-organised militant/political
party much in terms of membership
and the worse example is the
emergence of
the SPLM – DC, which came into existence as a result of accumulative
mismanagements, alienations, marginalization and clear tribal dominance
in the
SPLM party.
The argument here is that there exists more than ten other southern
Sudanese political parties whose members were at different times either
members of the SPLM/A or its sympathizers as such The members of the
SPLM – DC is not the only group of south Sudanese to walk out of SPLM.
Whether these realities are disturbing or not, however, they represent
our political realities and can only be addressed through democratic
means, which don’t exist in our Government of South Sudan (GoSS) in
its existing form as seen today.
A
number of southern
political groups have already made the work for the secession of south
Sudan an open policy that they persistently present on all the
international fora. Unfortunately, it took the dominant SPLM a lot of
pains and struggles to come out on those few occasions to utter the fact
that secession is in fact a popular demand amongst southern Sudanese
across the various political, religious and ethnic divides. But even so
when they (SPLM) voiced it (secession) they always
did so with mix feelings and hurry to refute it the following day. Those calls by
the First Vice President of Sudan and the President of South Sudan, and
Chairman of the SPLM (the junior partner in the GoNU) Pres. Salva Kiir
Mayardit , asking people in
places like Kadugli (the Nuba Mountains), Damazin (Southern Blue) or
recently in the Oil – rich contested region of Abyei to work and vote
for the unity of the Sudan, while in Juba the same Salva Kiir finds it
appeasing to ask the masses
to vote for independence as what happened at Saint Theresa’s Cathedral
in Juba the Capital of South Sudan, and his call at the Ugandan border
town of Moyo reaching out to the Ugandans to
be amongst the first to recognise the Independent South Sudan State come
this option in the 2011 referendum.
The people of south Sudan at this juncture are left without any doubt
demanding an explanation from their leader who has been on record for
issuing all the above contradictory
statements that are
full of mix messages, characteristically dictated by his immediate
audiences and
place with
no consideration and respect to the intelligence of
those who follow all that he says and would want to make a sense out of
them, given his sensitive position as a leader. But of course, for any
one who follows events very closely it doesn’t need rocket science to
conclude that Salva
Kiir is struggling to balance the equation of remaining in power
whichever way the southerners choose to go.
However, the manner these pro-independence calls are being sandwiched
into SPLM’s official speeches lately can also be analysed as this
party’s attempt at putting pressure on its slippery partner the NCP.
This has been expressed by Pres. Salva Kiir Mayardit in his latest
meeting with the Egyptian president Mohamed Hosni Mubarak in Cairo. In
this meeting Kiir was reported to have said that, they in the SPLM are
doing their best to preserve, promote and maintain the Unity of the
Sudan, but it is the NCP that is forcing the south to opt for secession
come 2011. Should this be true then it is crystal clear that SPLM is
putting partisanship ahead of the realization of the much anticipated
south Sudan nation. The independence of south Sudan should never be
allowed to be used by any self-interested groups
in order to win partisan scores, but should be viewed in the wider south
Sudanese nationalism as a noble goal to be attained.
We, in the United South
Sudan Party (USSP) have
monitored on our side that when not much is put in the media by pro-
secessionist parties, Kiir remains comfortable in his cocoon of the
united Sudan, only to be awakened when other south Sudanese political
parties hit the headlines in the international media to shade more light
on the deafening calls by the masses for a
separate state in
the south.
We
think that if it is true that whether it is Salva Kiir as an individual
or there are some of his followers who have officially shifted from the
notion of a united New Sudan to promoting the uncompromising wish of
the south Sudanese for independence, then
they should do so with unfailing vigour
as it is done in the USSP. Thus, they should distance themselves from
those people who always stand
up to refute those statements as what happened lately following the
President Salva Kiir’s declarations made in church, the Cathedral,
in Juba or the one in Tripoli (Libya) or
the latest one in the Moyo District of Uganda.
We believe that a true south Sudanese secessionist can only find
comfort in USSP, because it is only here that the north / south divide
is clearly argued, defined and presented in unambiguous
terms. It
is in the USSP that a call for the secession of south Sudan is
applauded, never refutable and never withdrawn defensively in the name
of misunderstood or misquoted messages.
In
the USSP, we strongly believe in and
maintain a clear stand with vivid messages both locally and
internationally that whatsoever the degree of appeasement we are to be
offered we will never forsake the noble walk towards the Noble Dream
of an independent south
Sudan nation, a dream
that we have all shared across generations. The whole world can keep
their alms to themselves if all these alms are meant to compromise our
noble goal.
We
strongly uphold the believe that the use of the south Sudan secession as
a pressure slogan by the SPLM just in order to bring about a regime
change in Khartoum while not in fact working to establish a democratic
independent state in south Sudan, should in no way be underrated – it is
no less than the very treason being directed towards the New SPLM – DC
for its alleged collaboration with
the Arab north, which if fairly argued would
extend to included many other groups least of which would be those
officials who facilitate deals of the dubious northern private sectors
widely operating in south
Sudan many of which are participating in covert activities
while disguising as benign businessmen.
In
conclusion, it is only normal to see those who were leading the self-deluded New
Sudan vision of a united secular Sudan, should now get a place for
themselves in the rear wagons should they want to join the caravan that
is heading towards the promised land. It defies logic that a unionist
could turn around now to champion
independence procession unless
hypocrisy becomes an acceptable vice.
Dr. Justin Ambago Ramba, M.B,
B.Ch, D.R.H, MD. The
Secretary General of the United
South Sudan Party (USSP).
The party that stands for the independence of South
Sudan. Can be reached at either
justinramba@doctors.org.uk or justinramba@aol.co.uk
NB: those who read this article also visited www.nilebuffalo.com and
blog http//ussp-news.blogspot.com
COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE
Disclaimer:
The views expressed
above are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent those of the
website. |