Bloodshed in South: Who's to blame?BY: Moses Dang Gatluak,
CANADA
JUNE 5/2010, SSN; Who should be blamed for the cause of
another bloodshed in south? The conflict at this juncture
that's claiming
many innocent lives occurred due to having wrong advice to the
presidential office. It was not expected by the individuals who gave
wrong influences with no extended vision to anticipate what the
counter reaction would be if losers are announced winners.
Also, the Election commission chairperson, Mr. Abel Alair, added
up his plan to bring up the war among southerners as a means to
derail south independence as a delaying tactic.
It is an undeniable fact for him (Uncle Abel) that he planned it
purposely to create the way southerners must baffle and keep
away from their plan to prepare for referendum. If that was not
it, he should have compile better electoral rules.
However, GOSS leaders did not open their eyes to see what was
behind all those interests. If losers were not announced
winners, there wouldn't be lost of lives or unexpected war
within a few months toward referendum.
In the first place, independent candidates were right as an
information released from the presidential office was not to
nominate people randomly to run for governorship in all states.
The surprised plan to nominate individuals came after those
called today independent candidates declared or began their
primary campaign in which they have popularity in their states
could run till voters decided to chose their governors.
Regardless all that, voters were not panicked to pick their
choices, nevertheless, president Kiir insisted to impose his
favorable people through the door of no return which today
culminated with two SPLA military camps. Who should be counted
wrong in that judgment?
In fact, this current war is not a war
without cause, for any south citizens who have participated
his/her time in the liberation can claim his/her rights if
humiliated by the same colleagues who have been in an enemy line
together in the same struggle.
What I think other southerners should profess from those have
been disappointed with election result is compromise for none of
us need to see another internal liberation caused by
self-interests. On the other hand, this is an act of president
to equalize veterans instead to pick some and ignore the rest as
many whined their rights denied by the president.
In contrast, many southerners claim negatively that George Athor
had lost the election which is baseless and at the same time
can not even help to solve the problem since it should be a violation of Athor's rights.
It was obvious to many
southerners that most independent candidates won including Athor,
but their rights were contravened just because they did not drop
their independent candidacy as the office of the president stipulated.
Plus, there was rigging that was carried out through all states. Which
indicated Athor's action is against the whole system.
Those challenges can't make him calm instead they will increase his
anger and the anger of others victims of election, who didn't
want to raise their concerns about what happened and avoided
taking part in the protest as Athor did.
At this critical moment,
writers and readers need to be sincere to tell the truth of
the undemocratic election that took place and condemn the continuous
tyrannical regime and end corruption.
As the matter of fact, the time is not right for war or to take
action against anything that could cause war as Athor has done.
He
can wait like others who have forgotten that injustice for the
sake of North-South battle that he himself had been in it for more
than two decades.
As my personal view, this is the impact of having only one
party in power without other parties involvement in the
system. South has many different parties which if the situation
allowed,
all could participate in a peace process to mitigate that problem
at once.
In that case, SPLM party needs to create a new system
to make a coalition with other parties. If it insists on owning
the
south by itself by using SPLA army, it may end up with many
small army groups which will carry out different kinds
of agendas.
For the sake of the nation and using of brutal acts during
the election, president Kiir should apologize to the general community
of south, victims of this war, veterans whom he denied and
independent candidates.
He also needs to put in mind and treat the SPLA as a national army
for entire south to avoid another future military reaction.
Besides, it's known that the military complies with president's order,
but the president himself should respect citizens rights.
All
these blames fall on the president as he gives the country to friends
and relatives like a piece of cake.
We have to remind ourselves that GOSS doesn't need to
sleep in this time of political war with North. Coming game will
not be like 2008 census and April 2010 national election
rigging. Although the country is under critical condition, it still
needs to campaign for the Referendum instead.
At this
time, peace in the south is in the hands of Kiir to avoid
unsustainable
rebellion.
What Can Help The Most?
What can help the most in this contemporary conflict in
south? Blame, accusation, challenge, criticism, implication,
advise or none of the above.
The answer is difficult because any matter that involves
military action has few people to tackle it. I think the answer
to this war should be
Salva Kiir, Riek Machar,
James Wani,
Pagan Amum,
Paulino Matip and chief of staff
James
Hoth Mai, by using peaceful approach. These most
influential figures I hope will diffuse or buffer this conflict
and yet deserve blaming, discredit or credit.
Thanks;
By Moses Dang Gatluak, Canada